Perry
Perry v. Brown
639 F.3d 1153·2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 7311
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 23, 2011No. 10-16696California75 words
Lead Opinion
*1154 ORDER
Having considered all of the factors set forth in Nken v. Holder, - U.S. -, 129 S.Ct. 1749, 1756 , 173 L.Ed.2d 550 (2009), and all of the facts and circumstances surrounding Plaintiffs’ motion to vacate the stay pending appeal, as well as the standard for vacatur set forth in Southeast Alaska Conservation Council v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, 472 F.3d 1097, 1101 (9th Cir.2006), we deny Plaintiffs’ motion at this time.