Galindo-Romero

Galindo-Romero v. Holder

Good Law
640 F.3d 873·2011 WL 1746135
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 2, 2010No. 05-73517California3,663 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Bybee, J.

ORDER

The panel has unanimously decided to amend its opinion, available at 621 F.3d 924 , filed on September 2, 2010.

On page 928, delete footnote 4.

On page 930, delete footnote 5.

With these amendments, the panel has voted to deny the petition for rehearing and petition for rehearing en banc.

The full court has been advised of the petition for rehearing en banc and no judge has requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. Fed. R.App. P. 35.

The petition for panel rehearing and the petition for rehearing en banc, filed January 13, 2011, are hereby DENIED. No future petitions for rehearing will be entertained. General Order 5.3(a).

OPINION

Petitioner Pedro Galindo-Romero (“Galindo”) seeks review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) dismissing his appeal of an Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) decision terminating his for *875 mal removal proceedings. The BIA and IJ held that they lacked jurisdiction over Galindo’s removal proceedings, including his application for cancellation of removal, because of an un-reinstated expedited removal order previously issued against Galindo. Galindo argues that the agency’s decision to relinquish jurisdiction based…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.