Noble

Noble v. Adams

Good Law
646 F.3d 1138·2011 WL 3275871
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 17, 2011No. 09-17251California2,796 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Trott, J.

ORDER

With the filing of the Amended Opinion, Pro Se Appellee’s petition for rehearing filed April 8, 2011, is hereby DENIED, no further petitions for rehearing will be accepted.

OPINION

Adams and Cuevas are prison officials responsible for a post-riot lockdown of Corcoran State Prison in California. They appeal the district court’s denial of their assertion of qualified immunity against inmate Noble’s claim that the lockdown resulted in a denial of his Eighth Amendment right to outdoor exercise. We have jurisdiction over this timely appeal, and we reverse and remand with instructions to enter judgment in favor of the officials.

Background

During 2002, Noble was a prisoner in the Substance Abuse Treatment Center (“SATF”) at Corcoran State Prison. He is an African-American who was also a “former” street gang member from Los Angeles- — -a “Crip.” Noble was classified as a “Level IV’ inmate, the highest level of custody, and he was housed in Facility C.

Because of a particularly violent armed riot on Facility C’s exercise yard by Afri *1140 can-American prisoners against staff on January 09, 2002, described by the Facility Captain of SATF as the most violent and savage attack…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.