Leonardo

ORDER

The opinion filed May 13, 2011, slip op. 6263, and appearing at 2011 WL 1814706 (9th Cir.2011), is amended as follows:

At slip op. 6270, 2011 WL 1814706, at *2 , after and before 488 F.3d 812 , 815 (9th Cir.2007) >, insert the following: 503 U.S. 140, 146-49 , 112 S.Ct. 1081 , 117 L.Ed.2d 291 (1992) (recognizing “at least three broad sets of circumstances in which the interests of the individual weigh heavily against requiring administrative exhaustion”), superseded by statute on other grounds as stated in Booth v. Churner, 532 U.S. 731 , 121 S.Ct. 1819 , 149 L.Ed.2d 958 (2001); >.

With this amendment, the panel has voted to deny the petition for panel rehearing and the petition for rehearing en banc.

The full court has been advised of the petition for rehearing en banc and no judge has requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. Fed. R.App. P. 35.

The petition for panel rehearing and the petition for rehearing en banc are DENIED.

No further petitions for rehearing will be entertained.

*1159 OPINION

Jaime Aldos Leonardo, Jr. appeals the district court’s judgment dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 habeas…