Arkison

Executive Benefits Insurance Agency v. Arkison

Good Law
661 F.3d 460
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 4, 2011No. 11-35162California147 words

Lead Opinion

ORDER

The court invites supplemental briefs by any amicus curiae addressing the following questions: Does Stern v. Marshall, — U.S. —, 131 S.Ct. 2594 , 180 L.Ed.2d 475 (2011), prohibit bankruptcy courts from entering a final, binding judgment on an action to avoid a fraudulent conveyance? If so, may the bankruptcy court hear the proceeding and submit a report and recommendation to a federal district court in lieu of entering a final judgment?

Any briefs responding to this order shall be filed no later than thirty days from the filed date of this order. All briefs shall *477 comply with the page or type-volume limitations specified in Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure 29(d) and 32(a)(7). Any person or entity wishing to file a brief as an amicus curiae in response to this order is granted leave to do so pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 29(a).