Simmonds

Simmonds v. Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC

Good Law
678 F.3d 1139
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 15, 2012Nos. 09-35262, 09-35363, 09-35280, 09-35282, 09-35375, 09-35285, 09-35286, 09-35367, 09-35288, 09-35289, 09-35290, 09-35381, 09-35292, 09-35364, 09-35293, 09-35297, 09-35373, 09-35300, 09-35301, 09-35374, 09-35302, 09-35303, 09-35391, 09-35306, 09-35307, 09-35308, 09-35309, 09-35369, 09-35310, 09-35368, 09-35312, 09-35313, 09-35370, 09-35314, 09-35371, 09-35315, 09-35316, 09-35317, 09-35365, 09-35318, 09-35393, 09-35320, 09-35366, 09-35321, 09-35397, 09-35322, 09-35323, 09-35404, 09-35324, 09-35325, 09-35326, 09-35405, 09-35328, 09-35327, 09-35382, 09-35331, 09-35333, 09-35380, 09-35334, 09-35383, 09-35335, 09-35377, 09-35337, 09-35339, 09-35395, 09-35344, 09-35345, 09-35399, 09-35346, 09-35398, 09-35347, 90-35394, 09-35348, 09-35387, 09-35349, 09-35350, 09-35400, 09-35351, 09-35352, 09-35384, 09-35355, 09-35357, 09-35358, 09-35390, 09-35363California129 words

Lead Opinion

ORDER

The following Non-Moving Issuer cases are REMANDED to the district court for proceedings consistent with the Opinion of the Supreme Court in Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC v. Simmonds, — U.S. -, 132 S.Ct. 1414 , 182 L.Ed.2d 446 (2012): 09-35280, 09-35285, 09-35288, 09-35289, 09-35293, 09-35300, 09-35302, 09-35306, 09-35307, 09-35308, 09-35312, 09-35315, 09-35316, 09-35322, 09-35324, 09-35325, 09-35328, 09-35331, 09-35337, 09-35344, 09-35349, 09-35351, 09-35355, and 09-35357.

Consistent with this Court’s January 18, 2011 opinion, the district court is ordered to DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE the following Moving Issuer cases due to Simmonds’s failure to satisfy Delaware’s demand requirement: 09-35262, 09-35282, 09-35286, 09-35290, 09-35292, 09-35297, 09-35301, 09-35303, 09-35309, 09-35310, 09-35313, 09-35314, 09-35317, 09-35318, 09-35320, 09-35321, 09-35323, 09-35326, *1149 09-35327, 09-35333, 09-35334, 09-35335, 09-35339, 09-35345, 09-35346, 09-35347, 09-35348, 09-35350, 09-35352, and 09-35358.