Renfro

Renfro v. Funky Door Long Term Disability Plan

Good Law
686 F.3d 1044·2012 WL 2216727·2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 12281
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 18, 2012No. 11-15301California4,522 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Smith, J.

Jeff Renfro is insured under two long-term disability plans administered by Unum Life Insurance Company (Unum), namely, the Funky Door Long Term Disability Plan (the FDP), and the Service-Master Long Term Disability Plan (the SMP) (the FDP and the SMP collectively, the Plans). Renfro sued the Plans when Unum decided to deduct his Social Security Disability Insurance (SSDI) benefit as deductible income under each plan, resulting in what he terms a “double offset.” On cross summary judgment motions, the district court granted summary judgment in favor of the Plans, found that Unum’s interpretation of the Plans was not an abuse of discretion, and held that Renfro was not entitled to recovery under a theory of equitable estoppel. Renfro appeals the judgment of the district court. Because we find that Unum’s decision was not an abuse of discretion, that the plain language of the Plans permits the deduction of the SSDI benefit from each plan, and that Renfro is not entitled to equitable estoppel, we affirm the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of the Plans.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

I. The Funky Door Plan

Renfro was employed since 2002 as a yoga…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.