Resisting Environmental Destruction on Indigenous Lands, Redoil v. United States Environmental Protection Agency

Good Law
716 F.3d 1155·2013 WL 1729835·2013 A.M.C. 2491·43 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20093·76 ERC (BNA) 1815
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 26, 2012No. 12-70518California4,813 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

McKeown, J.

Since 1990, the Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) has been responsible for regulating air pollution from offshore sources on the Outer Continental Shelf (“OCS”) under the Clean Air Act (“the Act”). 42 U.S.C. § 7627 . We consider here whether the EPA’s Environmental Appeals Board (“EAB”) properly upheld two air permits authorizing exploratory drilling operations in the Arctic Ocean by a drillship and its associated fleet of support vessels. The petition for review challenges two aspects of the permits: (1) the determination that support vessels, unlike the drillship itself, do not require the best available control technology (“BACT”) to *1158 control emissions; and (2) the exemption of the area within a 500-meter radius of the drillship from ambient air quality standards.

The application of BACT to support vessels requires us to reconcile conflicting provisions of the Act. In doing so, under Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. NRDC, Inc., we defer to the EAB’s reasonable interpretation of those provisions and related regulations. 467 U.S. 887 , 104 S.Ct. 2778 , 81 L.Ed.2d 694 (1984). Likewise, we evaluate whether the EAB’s decision on the ambient air boundary is a permissible…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.