Sarei

Sarei v. Rio Tinto, PLC

Good Law
722 F.3d 1109·2013 WL 3357740
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 28, 2013Nos. 02-56256, 02-56390, 09-56381California82 words

Lead Opinion

*1110 ORDER

This case is before us after the Supreme Court’s order of April 22, 2013, vacating and remanding on the basis of Kiobel v. Royal Dutch Petroleum Co., — U.S. —, 133 S.Ct. 1659 , 185 L.Ed.2d 671 (2013). The parties have submitted supplemental briefs on the effect of that decision.

Upon due consideration, a majority of the en banc court has voted to affirm the district court’s judgment of dismissal with prejudice. The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.