Tamayo-Tamayo

ORDER

The opinion filed February 28, 2013, and published at 709 F.3d 795 , is amended as follows:

On slip opinion page 6 [ 709 F.3d at 797 ], first full paragraph, lines 1-2, change “Our decision in Hing Sum v. Holder, 602 F.3d 1092 (9th Cir.2010), is not to the contrary. It interpreted” to “Our decision in Hing Sum v. Holder, 602 F.3d 1092 (9th Cir.2010), and the BIA’s decision in In re Quilantan, 25 I. & N. Dec. 285 (B.I.A.2010), are not to the contrary. Those decisions interpreted”.

On slip opinion page 6 [ 709 F.3d at 797 ], first full paragraph, line 4, change “In that case,” to “In Hing Sum,”.

On slip opinion page 8 [ 709 F.3d at 798 ], at the end of the first paragraph, insert:

With these amendments, Judge Graber has voted to deny the petition for rehearing en banc, and Judges Noonan and Fisher have so recommended.

The full court has been advised of the petition for rehearing en banc, and no judge of the court has requested a vote on it.

The petition for rehearing en banc is DENIED. No further petitions for rehearing or rehearing en banc will be entertained.

OPINION

Petitioner Pedro Tamayo-Tamayo petitions for review of the government’s reinstatement of a prior…