Coronado

Coronado v. Holder

Good Law
759 F.3d 977·2014 WL 3537027
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 14, 2014No. 11-72121California4,488 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Nguyen, J.

ORDER AND AMENDED OPINION

ORDER

The opinion filed on March 14, 2014, and appearing at 747 F.3d 662 , is amended. The superseding amended opinion is filed concurrently with this order.

With these amendments, the panel has voted to deny the petition for panel rehearing. Judge Bybee and Judge Nguyen have voted to deny the petition for rehearing en banc, and Judge Benavides has so recommended. The full court has been advised of the petition for rehearing en banc and no judge of the court has requested a vote on en banc rehearing. See Fed. R.App. P. 35(f).

The petition for panel rehearing and rehearing en banc is DENIED. No further petitions for rehearing or rehearing en banc will be entertained.

OPINION

Raul Quijada Coronado petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ *981 (“BIA”) decision finding him inadmissible and denying his application for cancellation of removal. Coronado argues that the BIA erred in concluding that he had suffered two prior convictions for possession of a controlled substance prohibited under the Federal Controlled Substances Act (“CSA”), 21 U.S.C. § 802 . See 8 U.S.C. § 1182 (a)(2)(A)(i)(II). Coronado further argues that the BIA erred in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.