Aguilera-Rios

United States v. Aguilera-Rios

Good Law
769 F.3d 626·2014 WL 4800292·2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 18889
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 17, 2014No. 12-50597California4,703 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Berzon, J.

ORDER AND AMENDED OPINION

ORDER

The opinion filed on June 17, 2014, is hereby amended. The superseding amended opinion will be filed concurrently with this order. No further petitions for rehearing or petitions for rehearing en banc will be entertained.

OPINION

Jorge Aguilera-Rios (“Aguilera”), a citizen of Mexico, was convicted of a California firearms offense, removed from the United States on the basis of that convie *629 tion, and, when he returned to the country, tried and convicted of illegal reentry under 8 U.S.C. § 1326 . He contends that his prior removal order was invalid because his conviction under California Penal Code § 12021(c)(1) was not a categorical match for the Immigration and Nationality Act’s (“INA”) firearms offense. We agree that he was not originally removable as charged, and so could not be convicted of illegal reentry. We therefore reverse the judgment of conviction.

I.

Aguilera entered the United States without inspection at the age of five to live with his parents, who were lawful permanent residents. He became a lawful permanent resident in 2000. Two years later, he was convicted of unlawful firearms possession in violation of California Penal…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.