Dicon Fiberoptics, Inc. v. Franchise Tax Board

Good Law
139 Cal. Rptr. 3d 825·2012 Cal. LEXIS 3819·53 Cal. 4th 1227·2012 WL 1432313·274 P.3d 446
Supreme Court of CaliforniaApril 26, 2012S173860California6,171 words

Opinion

Opinion

Liu, J.

The Enterprise Zone Act (Gov. Code, § 7070 et seq.) was enacted “to stimulate business and industrial growth” in “areas within the state that are economically depressed due to a lack of investment in the private sector.” (Id., § 7071, subd. (a).) Among the incentives available to businesses that operate within an enterprise zone is a hiring tax credit in the amount of a percentage of the wages paid to a “qualified employee.” (Rev. & Tax. Code, § 23622.7, subd. (a).) A “qualified employee” is an employee who falls into one of several categories, such as being eligible for the federal Job Training Partnership Act ( 29 U.S.C., § 1501 et seq.) or the Greater Avenues for Independence Act of 1985 (GAIN; Welf. & Inst. Code, § 11320.33). To claim the tax credit, the employer must satisfy several requirements, including obtaining from a governmental agency “a certification that provides that a qualified employee meets the eligibility requirements.” (Rev. & Tax. Code, § 23622.7, subd. (c).)

Dicon Fiberoptics, Inc. (Dicon), is a California corporation that does business in an enterprise zone. Dicon hired workers for whom it had obtained the required certifications, and it claimed a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.