Mendoza

People v. Mendoza

Bad Law
132 Cal. Rptr. 3d 808·2011 Cal. LEXIS 11617·52 Cal. 4th 1056·263 P.3d 1
Supreme Court of CaliforniaNovember 10, 2011S065467California17,275 words

Opinion

Opinion

Baxter, J.

A jury convicted defendant Ronald Bruce Mendoza of first degree murder (Pen. Code, § 187, subd. (a)), and found true the allegation that he personally used a firearm in commission of the murder (§ 12022.5, subd. (a)). The jury also found true the three special circumstance allegations that defendant intentionally killed a police officer (§ 190.2, subd. (a)(7)), that he committed murder for the purpose of avoiding a lawful arrest (§ 190.2, subd. (a)(5)), and that he intentionally killed the victim by means of lying in wait (§ 190.2, subd. (a)(15)). Thereafter the jury returned a verdict of death. At the sentencing hearing, the trial court struck the lying-in-wait special circumstance and then entered a judgment of death. Appeal to this court is automatic. (§ 1239, subd. (b).)

Because the trial court had no authority to strike a special circumstance found by the jury, we reinstate the lying-in-wait special circumstance. As so modified, the judgment of death is affirmed.

I. Facts

A. The Guilt Phase

At approximately 1:30 a.m. on May 11, 1996, defendant shot Pomona Police Officer Daniel Tim Fraembs in the face and killed him. The evidence included the testimony of an…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.