Mahon

United States v. Mahon

Good Law
804 F.3d 946·2015 WL 6143331
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 20, 2015No. 12-10273California3,058 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Owens, J.

Order; Opinion by Judge OWENS.

ORDER

The opinion filed on July 20, 2015 [ 793 F.3d 1115 ] is amended' and filed concurrently with this order.

The panel voted to deny the petition for panel rehearing. Chief Judge Thomas and Judge Owens voted to deny the petition for rehearing en bane, and Judge Bena-vides so recommends.

The full court has been advised .of the suggestion for rehearing en banc, and no active judge has requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. Fed. R.App. P. 35.

The panel voted to deny the motion to stay.

The motion to stay, the petition for rehearing, and the petition for rehearing en banc are DENIED. No further petitions shall be entertained.

*949 OPINION

Dennis Mahon appeals his convictions under 18 U.S.C. §§ 844 (i) and (n) for the pipe bomb explosion at the City of Scottsdale Office of Diversity and Dialogue (“Diversity Office”), which injured three people and damaged property. Section 844(i) makes it a crime to damage or destroy, by means of an explosive, property that is “used in” interstate commerce or in “activity affecting” interstate commerce. Ma-hon contends his convictions are invalid because the Diversity Office’s activities did…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.