Lkhagvasuren

Lkhagvasuren v. Lynch

Good Law
849 F.3d 800·2016 WL 7644787
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 13, 2016No. 13-71778California877 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

ORDER

The last paragraph of page four of the slip opinion filed on July 13, 2016, is hereby amended as follows:

With this amendment, the Petition for Panel Rehearing is DENIED.

Judge Kozinski has voted to deny the Petition for Rehearing En Banc, and Judges Wallace and Schroeder so recommend. The full court has been advised of the Petition for Rehearing En Banc and no judge of the court has requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. Fed. R. App. P. 35. Accordingly, the Petition for Rehearing En Banc is DENIED. No subsequent petitions for rehearing or rehearing en banc may be filed.

Respondent’s unopposed motion for an extension of time to respond to the Petition for Panel Rehearing and for Rehearing En Banc is DENIED AS MOOT.

Petitioner’s motion to hold proceedings in abeyance pending a decision on his motion to reopen by the Board of Immigration Appeals is DENIED.

OPINION

Petitioner Otgonbayar Lkhagvasuren petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (Board) decision to deny his applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and deferral of removal under the Convention Against Torture (CAT). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.