People v. Gustafson CA4/2

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 2, 2022E078896California1,386 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 11/2/22 P. v. Gustafson CA4/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION TWO

THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent, E078896

v. (Super.Ct.No. FVI702850)

ROY RANDALL GUSTAFSON, OPINION

Defendant and Appellant.

APPEAL from the Superior Court of San Bernardino County. John P. Vander

Feer, Judge. Affirmed.

Roy Randall Gustafson, in pro. per., and Nancy J. King, under appointment by the

Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.

No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent.

Defendant and appellant, Roy Randall Gustafson, filed a petition for resentencing

under various statutes, Senate Bills, and Assembly Bills. The court denied the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.