Pace
United States v. Pace
Opinion
Lead Opinion
MEMORANDUM *
Alen Pace III appeals his conviction and 290-month sentence, following a jury trial for robbery affecting interstate commerce, conspiracy to commit robbery affecting interstate commerce, use of a firearm in connection with a crime of violence, and money laundering. He testified in his own defense. He argues that the district court erred by admitting hearsay statements against him and improperly restricting his cross-examination of Lamar Wade. Pace also contends that he is entitled to the presentence reports of co-defendants who pled guilty and testified against him. Finally, Pace argues that the district court erred in enhancing his offense level by two levels pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 2B3.1(b)(3)(A) because a victim of the robbery sustained bodily injury. Because none of his arguments has merit, we affirm.
*617 DISCUSSION
The district court committed no reversible error by admitting the statements. Pace argues that Gayla Shelby improperly testified (1) that he told her that Timothy Anderson was supposed to say that he, not Pace, owned an automobile that was purchased in part with robbery proceeds; (2) that Pace told her that he owned thirteen properties that Anderson…