Dearas-Kurilich

Dearas-Kurilich v. Ashcroft

Good Law
65 F. App'x 656
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 12, 2003No. 02-72602; INS No. A70-781-824California271 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM ***

Dora Isabel Dearas-Kurüich, a native and citizen of Honduras, petitions for review of the order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) denying as untimely her motion to reopen. Because the transitional rules apply, we have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1105a(a). See Socop-Gonzalez v. INS, 272 F.3d 1176, 1183 (9th Cir.2001) (en banc). We review the denial of a motion to reopen for abuse of discretion, and legal issues de novo. Rodriguez-Lariz v. INS, 282 F.3d 1218, 1222 (9th Cir.2002). We deny the petition.

Because the government concedes that the BIA mailed its decision to an incorrect address, we have jurisdiction to review Dearas-Kurilich’s otherwise untimely petition. See Marbinez-Serrano v. INS, 94 F.3d 1256, 1259 (9th Cir.1996) (holding that jurisdictional period to file petition for review did not begin to run until BIA mailed copy of decision to correct address).

Dearas-Kurilich contends that the BIA should have equitably tolled the deadline for filing a motion to reopen due to the misconduct of her prior attorney. We disagree. The evidence in the record does not support a finding that Dearas-Kurilich’s former attorney engaged in fraudulent or…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.