Leatiota

United States v. Leatiota

Good Law
66 F. App'x 745
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 12, 2003No. 02-30150; D.C. No. CR-01-00433-JCCCalifornia144 words

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Rita Leatiota appeals her guilty-plea conviction and 90-day sentence imposed for wire fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1343 . Leatiota’s attorney has filed a brief and a motion to withdraw as counsel of record pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 , 87 S.Ct. 1396 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Leatiota has not filed a pro se supplemental brief.

Our review of the Anders brief and our independent review of the record under Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83 , 109 S.Ct. 346 , 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), disclose no issues requiring further review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED and the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.