Woods

Woods v. Noelle

Good Law
67 F. App'x 436
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 10, 2003No. 01-35996California820 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Laurence Woods (“Woods”), a Muslim inmate, appeals the District Court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of defendants, officials at the Multnomah County Inverness Jail (“Jail”) in Portland, Oregon. In his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action, Woods alleged that the defendants violated his rights under the First and Fourteenth Amendments to the Constitution by limiting the exercise and practice of his religion. On appeal, Woods contends that the District Court erred by granting summary judgment to defendants on the grounds that there were no genuine issues of material fact. For the reasons set forth below, we reverse the District Court’s decision and remand for further proceedings consistent with this memorandum.

We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . The parties are familiar with the facts and the procedural history of the case. Therefore, we do not repeat them here.

A district court’s grant of summary judgment in a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action is reviewed de novo. Bauer v. Sampson, 261 F.3d 775, 781 (9th Cir.2001); see also Scott v. Pasadena Unified Sch. Dist., 306 F.3d 646 , 652 (9th Cir.2002) (“We review the district court’s order granting summary judgment de…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.