Lewis

United States v. Lewis

Good Law
67 F. App'x 468
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 16, 2003No. 02-10283; D.C. No. CR-01-00156-JCMCalifornia231 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Marrisa Lewis appeals her guilty-plea conviction and 30-month sentence for four counts of credit card fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1029 (a), as well as the revocation of supervised release and resulting consecutive 12-month sentence for a previous conviction for conspiracy to distribute cocaine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846 . Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 , 87 S.Ct. 1396 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Lewis’ counsel has filed a brief stating that he finds no meritorious issues for review, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. Appellant has filed a pro se motion to dismiss counsel and appoint new counsel.

Our examination of the briefs and our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83-84 , 109 S.Ct. 346 , 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), disclose no arguable issues for review on direct appeal.

Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, appellant’s pro se motion to dismiss counsel is denied as moot, and the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.