Martinez

Johnson v. Martinez

Good Law
68 F. App'x 66
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 17, 2003No. 02-17101; D.C. No. CV-00-01416-MCE/GGHCalifornia293 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Kevin Bruce Johnson, a mobility-impaired California state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court’s summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging prison officials were deliberately indifferent to his requests to alleviate slippery conditions on the shower floor. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We review de novo. Frost v. Agnos, 152 F.3d 1124, 1128 (9th Cir.1998). We affirm in part, vacate in part, and remand.

The district court concluded that the defendants were entitled to qualified immunity on Johnson’s Eighth Amendment claim because the right at issue was not clearly established. This was error in light of our precedent holding that “slippery floors without protective measures could create a sufficient danger [to a disabled detainee] to warrant relief.” See id. at 1129-30 (reversing summary judgment where prison officials were aware that pretrial detainee who used crutches had fallen and injured himself on slippery shower floor yet declined to “take reasonable measures to assist [plaintiff] in showering safely”). We therefore vacate and remand for the district court to reconsider its summary judgment under Frost .

Given the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.