Mackby

United States v. Mackby

Good Law
68 F. App'x 776
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 3, 2003No. 02-16778California478 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM ***

In 1999, the United States won a civil judgment under the False Claims Act (“FCA”), 31 U.S.C. §§ 3729-3733 , against Peter Mackby, the former owner and managing director of the Asher Clinic, a physi *777 cal therapy clinic in Larkspur, California, for submitting false Medicare claims. In United States v. Mackby, 261 F.3d 821 (9th Cir.2001), we affirmed Mackby’s liability but remanded for a determination of whether $729,454.92 in civil penalties and treble damages violated the Excessive Fines Clause of the Eighth Amendment. On remand the district court upheld the full $729,454.92 judgment, concluding that it was not grossly disproportional to the gravity of Mackby’s offense. We review the question of whether a fine is constitutionally excessive de novo, United States v. Bajakajian, 524 U.S. 321 , 337 n. 10, 118 S.Ct. 2028 , 141 L.Ed.2d 314 (1998), and we affirm.

A fine violates the Excessive Fines Clause “if it is grossly disproportional to the gravity of a defendant’s offense.” Id. at 334 . The essence of Mackby’s offense was his use of someone else’s Medicare personal identification number to procure Medicare payments for which he was not eligible. Although not…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.