Colmenares-Robles

United States v. Colmenares-Robles

Good Law
68 F. App'x 801
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 16, 2003Nos. 01-10555, 02-10031California213 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

In 01-10555, Victor Manuel Colmenares-Robles appeals his conviction by guilty plea and sentence for illegal reentry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326 (a), with a sentencing enhancement pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1362 (b)(2). In 02-10031, Colmenares-Robles appeals the district court’s denial of his pro se motion for “summary judgment” on his motion for reconsideration of the use of prior convictions at sentencing in light of Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 , 120 S.Ct. 2348 , 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000).

After this court consolidated these appeals, Colmenares-Robles’s attorney filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 , 87 S.Ct. 1396 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and a motion to withdraw on the ground that his review of the record did not reveal any arguable issues. Colmenares-Robles did not file a pro se supplemental brief. Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83-84 , 109 S.Ct. 346 , 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no arguable issues.

We therefore GRANT counsel’s motion to withdraw and AFFIRM the district court’s judgment.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.