People v. Sherwood CA4/2

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 3, 2022E077239California4,242 words

Opinion

Opinion

FACTS

A. Opinion from Sherwood’s Appeal from the Conviction

In the opinion from Sherwood’s original appeal from his conviction and sentence,

a panel of this court summarized the crime for which he was convicted as follows.

“[T]he victim was shot at the front door of his residence. The police interviewed

Vavao Faumui, who told them that he, [Sherwood], and two other men went to the

victim’s residence to rob him. [Sherwood], who was a former employee of the victim,

believed that the victim kept a large amount of money in his safe at this residence.

Faumui told the police that when the victim answered the door, Faumui wrestled with

3 him. Then somebody shot the victim. The victim eventually died from his gunshot

wounds.

“The police also interviewed [Sherwood]. [Sherwood] said that the plan was to go

to the victim’s house and steal the safe, and that nobody was supposed to be home at the

time. [Sherwood] said that he drove Faumui to the victim’s house, dropped him off, and

then parked across the street to act as a lookout, in case the police came.

“[Sherwood] was charged with several offenses, and pled not guilty. His case went

to trial on September 6, 2006. After a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.