United States v. Williams

Good Law
73 F. App'x 227
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 6, 2003Nos. 02-50316, 02-50326; D.C. Nos. CR-00-00722-FMC-7, CR-00-00722-FMC-02California781 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM *

Thomas Edward Williams and Roxie Nadine Carroll 1 appeal their judgments of conviction and sentences on conspiracy charges, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371 , as well as multiple counts of mail fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1341 , wire fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1343 (Williams only), bank fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1344 (Williams only), and false representation of a Social Security number, in violation of 42 U.S.C. § 408 (a)(7)(B) (Carroll only). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and we affirm.

Although the indictment is concededly “muddy,” it can be fairly read as charging one conspiracy with multiple objects: the violation of each of the substantive fraud offenses charged. Cf. United States v. Bauer, 84 F.3d 1549, 1560-61 (9th Cir.1996). Appellants’ 2 preferred reading — that the conspiracy had only two objects, the first of which was to violate all of the substantive fraud statutes together, and the second was to engage generally in a “scheme” to commit real estate fraud — is nonsensical. Thus, the jury instructions informing the jurors that they needed to find only “a plan to commit at least one of the crimes alleged in the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.