Vasquez-Moreno

Vasquez-Moreno v. Immigration & Naturalization Service

Good Law
73 F. App'x 249
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 15, 2003No. 01-71844; INS Nos. A-74-814-836, A-74-814-837California493 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Fernando Vasquez-Moreno and his wife Delfina Cerezo-Diaz (“the Petitioners”), both natives and citizens of Mexico, petition for review of a final decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) denying their motion to reconsider the dismissal of their appeal as untimely and to reopen their deportation proceedings. The transitional rules of the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996 apply, and we have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1105a(a). See Kalaw v. INS, 133 F.3d 1147, 1150 (9th Cir.1997). We review for abuse of discretion, INS v. Doherty, 502 U.S. 314, 323 , 112 S.Ct. 719 , 116 L.Ed.2d 823 (1992), and deny the petition.

The Petitioners filed their appeal of the Immigration Judge’s (“U”) denial of their applications for suspension of deportation six days late. The BIA dismissed the appeal as untimely. The Petitioners subsequently moved for the BIA to reconsider or reopen their deportation proceedings and alleged that the notary public they retained to file the appeal failed to act in a timely fashion. The BIA denied the motion.

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying the Petitioners’ motion to reconsider because…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.