Nightlife Partners, Ltd. v. City of Beverly Hills

MEMORANDUM **

Though the district court’s decision granting partial summary judgment to the city may have the indirect effect of “refusing ... [an] injunction[ ],” see 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (a)(1), we decline to interpret 28 U.S.C. § 1292 so broadly as to allow an interlocutory appeal that would inevitably result in “piecemeal review.” See Carson v. Am. Brands, Inc., 450 U.S. 79, 84 , 101 S.Ct. 993 , 67 L.Ed.2d 59 (1981).

DISMISSED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.