Luna-Perez

United States v. Luna-Perez

Good Law
74 F. App'x 713
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 25, 2003No. 02-10249California268 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Leonel Luna-Perez appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to dismiss the indictment on the ground that he was denied due process in the deportation proceedings underlying his indictment for illegal reentry under 8 U.S.C. § 1326 . We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We review de novo the denial of a motion to dismiss based on a collateral deportation challenge, and for clear error findings of fact regarding such a motion. United States v. Hinojosa-Perez, 206 F.3d 832, 835 (9th Cir.2000). We affirm.

Luna-Perez’s due process rights were not violated when the Immigration Judge ordered him deported in absentia, because the record shows he was sent adequate notice of the hearing. See INS v. Lopez-Mendoza, 468 U.S. 1032, 1038-39 , 104 S.Ct. 3479 , 82 L.Ed.2d 778 (1984) (noting that deportation proceedings are civil in nature, and may proceed in the absence of an alien who fails to appear despite being given a reasonable opportunity to attend); Farhoud v. INS, 122 F.3d 794, 796 (9th Cir.1997) (holding notice of deportation hearing sent to alien’s address by certified mail in accordance with agency regulations did not violate due process, because it…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.