Chatman

United States v. Chatman

Good Law
75 F. App'x 596
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 3, 2003No. 02-50132; D.C. No. CR-01-00674-SVW(1)California150 words

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Eddie Chatman appeals his guilty-plea conviction and 72-month sentence for being a felon in possession of a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922 (g)(1).

Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 , 87 S.Ct. 1396 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), counsel for Chatman has filed a brief stating that there are no meritorious issues for review, and a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. Chatman has not filed a pro se supplemental brief.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83 , 109 S.Ct. 346 , 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no further issues for review. Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED and the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.