Calvert

United States v. Calvert

Good Law
75 F. App'x 663
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 17, 2003No. 03-30087California331 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

*664 MEMORANDUM **

John Calvert challenges his 270-month sentence after re-sentencing following a conviction for conspiracy to retaliate against a witness, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1513 (b) and 371, felon in possession of a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 922 (g) and 924, and use of a firearm during a crime of violence, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924 (c). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . Because appellant raises this issue for the first time on appeal, we review for plain error, see United States v. Vences, 169 F.3d 611, 613 (9th Cir.1999), and we vacate and remand.

Appellant contends that the district court erred in imposing a sentence above the applicable minimum guideline, and that in applying United States Sentencing Guideline § 5G1.2, which provides for consecutive sentences in order to achieve total punishment, the district court is required to impose a sentence at the low end of appellant’s guideline range.

Appellant’s argument has merit. This court previously described “total punishment” found in U.S.S.G. § 5G1.2 as the “minimum sentence in the guideline range for the total offense level for all counts.” See United States v. Archdale, 229…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.