McIntee

United States v. McIntee

Good Law
76 F. App'x 146
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 18, 2003No. 03-30145; D.C. No. CR-02-00009-DWN-01California283 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Robert Steven Melntee appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty plea to one count of conspiracy to distribute a controlled substance ( 21 U.S.C. §§ 841 (b)(1)(A) and 846) and forfeiture ( 21 U.S.C. § 853 ).

Melntee contends that the district court violated the terms of his proffer agreement and U.S.S.G. § 1B1.8 by considering and relying on information obtained pursuant to Mclntee’s cooperation with the government. Melntee specifically contends that the district court used this information in applying a firearm enhancement under U.S.S.G. § 2D1.1, in not departing further downward under U.S.S.G. § 5K1.1, and in imposing a sentence at the high end of the applicable guideline range.

Mclntee’s contention regarding the firearm enhancement is incorrect. Although the district court disregarded a (non-binding) recommendation in the plea agreement against application of the firearm enhancement, the factual basis for the enhancement was a gun discovered by agents during a search of Mclntee’s residence, not information provided by Melntee in debriefing. To the extent that the district court considered covered information in not departing further downward or in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.