Vasquez

Vasquez v. Duncan

Good Law
76 F. App'x 190
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 22, 2003No. 00-15375; D.C. No. CV-98-01572-SICalifornia268 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

California state prisoner Steven Ray Vasquez appeals the district court’s denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas corpus petition, challenging his 1995 conviction and sentence for heroin possession, being under the influence, and unlawful driving or taking of a vehicle. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253 . We affirm.

Vasquez contends that the California state court violated his due process rights when it failed to hold a hearing on the voluntariness of his statements to a police officer while Vasquez was under the influence of heroin.

Assuming, without deciding, that the state trial court’s actions violated Vasquez’s rights to a hearing on whether his statements were voluntary, Vasquez nonetheless failed to demonstrate that the admission of these statements affected the outcome of the trial in light of the overwhelming evidence in support of his conviction. See Brecht v. Abrahamson, 507 U.S. 619 , 113 S.Ct. 1710 , 123 L.Ed.2d 353 (1993) (holding that petitioners are entitled to habeas relief only if a trial-type error, in light of the record as a whole, had a substantial and injurious effect or influence on the jury’s verdict). The district court…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.