Perry

MEMORANDUM ***

Appellant Shirley Perry (“Perry”) alleges a pattern of discrimination and retaliation based on race and gender by her former employer, Appellee Lockheed Missiles and Space Co. (“Lockheed”). Perry alleges that Lockheed violated the California Fair Employment and Housing Act when it (1) failed to promote her; (2) failed adequately to compensate, evaluate and train her; (3) subjected her to “intolerable” working conditions leading to her *823 constructive termination; and (4) retaliated against her for engaging in protected activities. She also alleges that (5) Lockheed’s actions breached an implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing. Proceeding in propria persona, Perry appeals the district court’s summary judgment ruling, entered on March 27, 2002, in Lockheed’s favor. 1 After a careful review of the record, the Court concludes that no genuine issue of material fact exists and that the district court correctly applied the relevant substantive law in entering summary judgment in favor of Lockheed. Lopez v. Smith, 203 F.3d 1122, 1131 (9th Cir.2000) (en banc).

1. Failure to Promote

Appellant alleges that she was passed over for promotions on account of her race…