Saklad
Standard Insurance v. Saklad
78 F. App'x 579
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 15, 2003No. 02-56397; D.C. No. CV-93-05472-MMMCalifornia46 words
Lead Opinion
ORDER *
The district court did not abuse its discretion in denying appellant’s motion for attorneys’ fees.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.