Krause

MEMORANDUM **

Waltraud Krause appeals pro se the district court’s Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) dismissal for lack of subject matter jurisdiction of her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action against defen *603 dant, Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Ernest M. Hiroshige.

The district court correctly dismissed Krause’s action on the ground that under the Rooker-Feldman doctrine federal district courts lack authority to review state court judgments. District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. Feldman, 460 U.S. 462, 476 , 103 S.Ct. 1303 , 75 L.Ed.2d 206 (1983); Worldwide Church of God v. McNair, 805 F.2d 888, 892-93 (9th Cir.1986); Branson v. Nott, 62 F.3d 287, 291-92 (9th Cir.1995).

AFFIRMED. 1

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

. We grant Krause’s request for judicial notice, and deny her motion to strike.