United States v. Jackson

Good Law
78 F. App'x 635
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 20, 2003No. 03-30134; D.C. No. CR-02-00044-SEHCalifornia220 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Terry Jackson appeals the sentence imposed following her guilty plea to one count of conspiracy to manufacture methamphetamine, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 846 . Jackson contends that the district court erred by denying her a downward departure based on the sentencing disparity between Jackson, who as an Indian could not be charged in state court, and four non-Indian persons who participated *636 in the same drug crime but were prosecuted in state court. Because the record is unclear as to whether the district court believed it had discretion to depart based on the specific ground advanced by Jackson, we cannot determine whether we have jurisdiction to entertain this appeal. Compare United States v. Lipman, 133 F.3d 726, 731 (9th Cir.1998) (“The district court’s explanation of its denial sufficiently indicates that the court recognized its authority to consider cultural assimilation as a potential basis for departure and reflects its discretionary decision not to do so in this case based upon the facts presented.”). We therefore remand for the district court to address the specific ground for departure advanced by Jackson and to clarify the basis for its…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.