Jimenez-Salcedo

United States v. Jimenez-Salcedo

Good Law
79 F. App'x 310
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 23, 2003No. 02-50572; D.C. No. CR-02-00453-ABCCalifornia161 words

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Enrique Jimenez-Salcedo appeals his guilty-plea conviction and 83-month sentence for one count of illegal re-entry after deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326 (a) with an enhancement pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1326 (b)(2). Jimenez-Salcedo’s attorney has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 , 87 S.Ct. 1396 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and has moved to withdraw as counsel of record on the ground that she failed to discover any arguable issues on appeal. Jimenez-Salcedo has not filed a pro se supplemental brief.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83-84 , 109 S.Ct. 346 , 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no arguable issues. We therefore GRANT counsel’s motion to withdraw and AFFIRM the district court’s judgment.

AFFIRMED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.