Placides

Placides v. Rumsfeld

Good Law
79 F. App'x 319
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 23, 2003No. 03-55331; D.C. No. CV-01-08897-DTCalifornia290 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Josefina Placides, a former employee of the United States Department of Defense, appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment holding that her action for employment discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act was time-barred. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We review de novo the district court’s summary judgment, Johnson v. Henderson, 314 F.3d 409, 413-14 (9th Cir. 2002), and we affirm.

The district court properly granted summary judgment because it is undisputed that Placides did not contact an Equal Employment Opportunity Counselor until nineteen months after leaving the Defense Department and that she waited more than four years after completing counseling to file her formal complaint. See 29 C.F.R. § 1614.105 (a)(1) (complainant must initiate pre-complaint counseling within 45 days of the alleged discrimination); 29 C.F.R. § 1614.106 (b) (complainant must file formal EEO complaint within 15 days of conclusion of pre-complaint counseling); Johnson, 314 F.3d at 414-16 .

Because Placides failed to demonstrate mental incapacity or other exceptional circumstances, the district court properly determined that she was not…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.