Martinez

Martinez v. Roe

Good Law
80 F. App'x 547
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 20, 2003No. 02-56727California363 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

California state prisoner Duncan G.J. Martinez appeals pro se the district court’s dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas corpus petition as untimely, challenging his 1996 jury-trial conviction and life sentence for first degree murder. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253 . We vacate and remand.

Martinez contends that he is entitled to tolling for the entire time his first timely-filed mixed federal habeas petition was pending in the district court.

At the time the district court dismissed Martinez’s first federal petition, the court did not have the benefit of our decisions in Ford v. Hubbard, 330 F.3d 1086, 1100 (9th Cir.2003) (as amended) (allowing a second petition to relate back to the first petition after concluding that the district court erred when it failed to inform a pro se petitioner that, on the face of his first *548 petition, he would be time-barred upon returning to federal court with newly-exhausted claims), Kelly v. Small, 315 F.3d 1063, 1070 (9th Cir.) (as amended), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 123 S.Ct. 2094 , 155 L.Ed.2d 1077 (2003) (deciding that “the district court must consider the alternative of staying the petition after…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.