Torio

Torio v. Immigration & Naturalization Service

Good Law
80 F. App'x 582
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 4, 2003No. 02-72109California315 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM *

Jerome Cayabyab Torio, a native and citizen of the Philippines, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ denial of his second motion to reopen deportation proceedings. This court reviews the denial of motions to reopen under the abuse of discretion standard. Rodriguez-Lariz v. INS, 282 F.3d 1218, 1222 (9th Cir.2002); Shaar v. INS, 141 F.3d 953, 955 (9th Cir.1998). We conclude that the BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying petitioner’s second motion to reopen, and we thus deny the petition. Because the parties are familiar with the facts, we recount them only as necessary.

A motion to reopen must be filed with the BIA within 90 days after entry of a final order of deportation, and no more than one motion may be filed. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2 (c)(2). Torio’s motion was both number-barred and time-barred as it was his second motion to reopen and was submitted over four years after a motion to reopen was due.

Torio’s motion did not fit within the regulatory exception for asylum based on changed circumstances. The evidence attached to Torio’s second motion to reopen did not establish that circumstances worsened in the Philippines, generally or in a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.