Diarra

Diarra v. Ashcroft

Good Law
81 F. App'x 156
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 13, 2003No. 02-72927; Agency No. A70-908-253California282 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Boubacar Diarra, a native and citizen of Mali, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) dismissal of his appeal of the immigration judge’s (“IJ”) denial of his application for asylum and withholding of deportation. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1105a(a). See Kalaw v. INS, 133 F.3d 1147, 1150 (9th Cir.1997). We review de novo claims of due process violations. See Hartooni v. INS, 21 F.3d 336, 339 (9th Cir.1994). We deny the petition.

According to documents provided by the parties, the BIA’s decision was not sent to Diarra’s counsel’s correct address until August 15, 2002. Therefore, Diarra’s petition for review, filed on September 12, 2002, was timely. See IIRIRA § 309(c)(4)(C) (petition for review must be filed within 30 days of the final order of deportation); see Martinez-Serrano v. INS, 94 F.3d 1256, 1258-59 (9th Cir.1996) (holding that the time for filing a petition for review begins to run when the BIA sends notice of its decision to petitioner or counsel’s correct address). Accordingly, Respondent’s motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction is denied.

Diarra contends the IJ’s adverse credibility determination was…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.