Childers

United States v. Childers

Good Law
81 F. App'x 220
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 14, 2003No. 03-10079; D.C. No. CR-02-00622-EHCCalifornia166 words

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

John Daniel Childers appeals his guilty-plea conviction and 70-month sentence for being a felon in possession of a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922 (g)(1). Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 , *221 87 S.Ct. 1396 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Childers’ counsel has filed a brief stating that he finds no meritorious issues for review, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83-84 , 109 S.Ct. 346 , 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no grounds for relief on direct appeal.

Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED and, in light of the valid appeal waiver in the plea agreement, the appeal is DISMISSED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.