Lewis

United States v. Lewis

Good Law
81 F. App'x 222
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 14, 2003No. 03-10140; D.C. No. CR-92-00229-1-PHX/PGCalifornia290 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Brandon D. Lewis appeals the 60-month sentence imposed upon the district court’s revocation of his supervised release term. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3742 . We vacate and remand, in part, and affirm, in part.

Lewis first contends that the district court erred in failing to give him the right to allocution under Fed.R.Crim.P. 32 before his sentencing on revocation of supervised release. As conceded by the government, the district court’s error is not harmless. See United States v. Carper, 24 F.3d 1157, 1162 (9th Cir.1994) (deciding that “when the district court has discretion to impose a sentence shorter than the one it selected, the denial of defendant’s right of allocution is not harmless error”); see Fed.R.Crim.P. 32(i)(4)(A)(ii). Accordingly, we vacate the sentence and remand on this issue.

Lewis also contends that the sentencing court erred in failing to resolve a factual dispute regarding the classification of his supervised release violation under U.S.S.G. § 7B1.1. The court did not err by not resolving this dispute because it unambiguously stated that resolution of the issue was unnecessary because it was not relying upon it for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.