Ward
Ward v. Stewart
Opinion
Lead Opinion
MEMORANDUM **
Arizona prisoner Timothy Lee Ward appeals pro se the district court’s order sua sponte dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action for failure to state a claim pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 (e)(2)(B)(ii). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We review de novo, Barren v. Harrington, 152 F.3d 1193, 1194 (9th Cir.1998) (order), and we affirm in part, reverse in part and remand.
The district court properly dismissed Ward’s access to courts claim challenging Arizona Department of Corrections Policy Number 902, because Ward has demonstrated his ability to present his claims to the court. See Madrid v. Gomez, 190 F.3d 990, 995 (9th Cir.1999) (internal quotation omitted) (a prisoner’s right of access to the courts “requires prison authorities to provide prisoners with the capability of bringing contemplated challenges to sentences or conditions of confinement before the courts.”).
The district court erred, however, in relying on Zuther v. Arizona, 199 Ariz. 104 , 14 P.3d 295 (2000), to dismiss Ward’s due process claim challenging the withholding of a $50 release fee in a dedicated discharge account. Zuther is inapposite because in that case, the prisoner was…