Santos

Santos v. Ashcroft

Good Law
81 F. App'x 934
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 20, 2003No. 02-74386; Agency No. A70-643-893California294 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Luis Enrique Leon Santos, a native and citizen of Peru, petitions pro se for review of the decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) summarily affirming *935 an Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) denial of his applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and for relief under the Convention Against Torture. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We review for substantial evidence and uphold the IJ’s decision unless the evidence compels a contrary result. See INS v. Elias-Zacarias, 502 U.S. 478 , 481 n. 1, 112 S.Ct. 812 , 117 L.Ed.2d 38 (1992). We deny the petition.

At his removal hearing, Leon Santos testified that he attended Shining Path meetings voluntarily; that no harm came to him when he refused to formally join the Shining Path; and that he applied for asylum in order to obtain a work permit. Therefore, substantial evidence supports the IJ’s determination that Leon Santos’ asylum claim was based upon economic motives and not his fear of political persecution. See Raass v. INS, 692 F.2d 596, 596 (9th Cir.1982) (denying asylum claim based on generalized economic disadvantage). Because Leon Santos did not establish eligibility for asylum, he…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.