Gamez

United States v. Gamez

Good Law
81 F. App'x 937
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 20, 2003No. 02-50560; D.C. No. CR-02-00110-RSWL-02California398 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Mario Rene Gamez appeals a 26-month sentence imposed after he pleaded guilty to conspiracy and receiving and possessing stolen goods in interstate shipments, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 371 and 659. We have jurisdiction under 18 U.S.C. § 3742 , and we affirm.

Gamez contends that the district court improperly denied his motion for a downward departure for substantial assistance to the government. In the absence of a government motion, however, the district court lacked the authority to grant such a departure, see United States v. Cruz-Guerrero, 194 F.3d 1029, 1031-32 (9th Cir.1999), so its denial of Gamez’s request was not an abuse of discretion. Additionally, a review of the record discloses that the government’s decision not to make a § 5K1.1 motion for downward departure was neither arbitrary nor capricious. See Wade v. United States, 504 U.S. 181 , 112 S.Ct. 1840 , 118 L.Ed.2d 524 (1992); United States v. Murphy, 65 F.3d 758 (9th Cir.1995).

Next Gamez contends, for the first time, that the district court erred in applying the USSG § 3B1.3 upward adjustment for his use of a special skill as a truck driver in the commission of his offense. Gamez did not raise…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.