Dehertoghe

Dehertoghe v. City of Hemet

Good Law
82 F. App'x 577
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 2, 2003No. 01-55928; D.C. No. CV-00-06629-MLRCalifornia1,241 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM *

Stacie Ann Dehertoghe and her three children (collectively, Dehertoghe) appeal the district court’s summary judgment in favor of the City of Hemet and officers Chris Gigandet, Gordon Champagne, and Max Beamesderfer in her action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 . We affirm in most respects, but we vacate, reverse, and remand the district court’s award of attorney’s fees.

I

As qualified immunity for Gigandet is at issue, we must first determine whether there was a constitutional violation. Saucier v. Katz, 533 U.S. 194 , 200, 121 S.Ct. 2151 , 150 L.Ed.2d 272 (2001).

“Where the officer has probable cause to believe that the suspect poses a threat of serious physical harm, either to the officer or to others, it is not constitutionally unreasonable to prevent escape by using deadly force.” Tennessee v. Garner, 471 U.S. 1, 11 , 105 S.Ct. 1694 , 85 L.Ed.2d 1 (1985); Graham v. Connor, 490 U.S. 386, 396 , 109 S.Ct. 1865 , 104 L.Ed.2d 443 (1989) (determining whether force used was excessive by evaluating “the severity of the crime at issue, whether the suspect poses an immediate threat to the safety of the officers or others, and whether he is actively resisting arrest or attempting…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.