McGwier

McGwier v. Motion Industries, Inc.

Good Law
83 F. App'x 213
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 15, 2003No. 02-35883; D.C. No. CV-01-00158-AAMCalifornia383 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Robert A. McGwier filed the underlying action alleging that Motion Industries had discriminated against him because of his depression in violation of Washington law. Motion Industries motioned for summary judgment. The district court granted this motion. McGwier appealed. Because the parties are familiar with the facts of the case, we do not recite them here. We have jurisdiction to hear this appeal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We affirm.

In Washington, a three-year statute of limitations applies to discrimination claims such as that brought by McGwier unless the alleged discrimination was part of a continuing violation. Washington v. Boeing Co., 105 Wash.App. 1 , 19 P.3d 1041, 1045 (Wash.Ct.App.2000). In determining when a cause of action accrues or if discrimination is part of a continuing violation, courts consider “whether the untimely act has the degree of permanence that should have triggered the employee’s awareness of discrimination and duty to assert his or her rights.” Id. at 1046 ; see also Hinman v. Yakima Sch. Dist. No. 7, 69 Wash.App. 445 , 850 P.2d 536, 539 (Wash.Ct.App.1993) (restating the general rule that “a statute of limitation commences to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.